Of course not. It could be half the people on the planet need to pay $200/yr

1/10000th would not pay $20/year

I always want to know what the hell it is these people claim to be working on lmao.

But seems like this guy is the real deal based on his post history

Simon has a lot more smaller projects than one big project these days (afaik, so special insights), which are more conducive to this maybe?

I always try to not use my phone when out and about, preferring to chat people up so we don't lose our IRL social skills. They are more interesting than whatever my phone might have to offer me in those moments.

I've shipped some features in my largest open source project (Datasette) recently using Claude Code: https://github.com/simonw/datasette/pull/2636

This matches my pattern, new stuff gets more Ai treatment than my older projects

it's possible the ones that are trying to make money are the ones who are more likely to be found

Can someone explain to me why there is such a large discrepancy for the different sides for math.random()? seems fairly large

It's actually not that bad. The graph just emphasises the subtle differences. The worst one (a 10) was rolled 696 times extra over the expected number of 100,000 rolls. That's like 0.3% deviation.

Looking at the Y axis scale shows that the variation is not as much as it seems.