Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | StevenNunez's commentslogin

Hello! Parent that's fully aware of this. My son has access to a landline and it solves the problem of tech as a tool vs a past time. If he thinks of his friend, he calls, friends reach out etc. No scrolling for something to do. I see my phone usage and am constantly trying to introduce friction into it. This is an extension of that concept.

I believe in you.


Please take my Samsung TV interface


A library I'm excited to not vibecode against!


I enjoyed unmute.sh too


Yes that one is great too


It's way too easy to export your context for this to be real. I moved away from ChatGPT from Gemini months ago and haven't thought of it. Paid.


What's the fun in that? Also I think /stop would help here.


Time to extend comma.ai!


Yeah, imagine having, say, two of these LIDAR sensors, each pointed towards the car's blind spots. Comma already does well with the car's built-in radar + vision on straight freeway runs, but can't reliably change lanes on its own. The built in blind spot detectors on most cars are a binary "there is/not a car present", which doesn't reliably determine if it's safe to actually do a lane change.


Does Openwork replace the need for openclaw? Seems like a more grown up version of it.


I've been been using OpenClaw for a bit now and the thing I'm missing is observability. What's this thing thinking/doing right now? Where's my audit log? Every rewrite I see fails to address this.

I feel Elixir and the BEAM would be a perfect language to write this in. Gateways hanging, context window failures exhaustion can be elegantly modeled and remedied with supervision trees. For tracking thoughts, I can dump a process' mailbox and see what it's working on.


https://github.com/z80dev/lemon

Sounds like exactly this, hot off the presses...


those are all great ideas -- you should build it :)


If it’s plugged into any of the mainstream models like GPT, GPT-OSS, Claude etc, they lie to you about what it’s thinking.

They deliberately only show you a fraction of the thoughts, but charge you for all the secret ones.


Agree on the observability. Every time I've seen that mentioned on the many, many discussions on Xitter theres one of the usual clickbait youtube 'bros' telling you to go watch their video on how to make your own ui for it. Really shouldn't need to for such a fundamentally basic and crucial part of it. It's a bit of a hot mess.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: