Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | data-ottawa's commentslogin

How you know this is a monopoly is that if you go on their documentation website half the video is how this rolls into Google Analytics.

This is using another product to reinforce the search and ads monopoly.

You can’t scrape content to build a better google or Gemini, you can’t make an OS to compete with Google or Apple, and you can’t make a Google Analytics competitor.

It’s plain anti competitive.


Google ADK might be useful, especially v2 reorients it around graph operators for control flow.

Your specific case is listed in the v2 docs with an operation that fans out to parallel many tasks then joins the results.


I’m just happy we’re talking about security.

That will make software safer alone.


In an absurd kind of way, it might turn out brutally honest.

This would be “apologize to the OpenClaw community for the following issues …. Say we’re going to do something so this doesn’t happen. Design a flashy page too, something that feels sombre but evokes exploration”


Sorry, what?

Deciding not to spend money with a company you don't like is not pointless. The point is that you're not participating in something that you judge to be wrong.

The world is full of things I feel are wrong yet have near zero power to stop. That does not mean I should willingly support those things.


I'm writing my (Canadian) MP to this effect.

There are a lot of issues with the UK approach. Privacy is a big one. But requiring this on every service is both a tax on the service and requires constantly authorizing stuff. That opens up the possibility for scams, data misuse, etc.

And no, saying we said to only use the data for verification clearly doesn't work. It didn't work for discord, or Persona, or Tea or AU10TIX or any others. Verification now means sharing that data with credit agencies and third party databases. Verification means keeping some data to resolve customer support disputes. There's data leakage for training and creating derived data products like biometric embeddings for future use.

Third party verification is a security nightmare.

I don't know why device based approvals abd controls aren't considered at all. Or really any privacy preserving technique.

And all this for ~54% efficacy?


There is no such thing as privacy protecting or anonymous age verification. If you tell Canadian that such a thing is possible, they are guaranteed to harm privacy with any legislation they proposal. Just tell them no.

> There is no such thing as privacy protecting or anonymous age verification

There most definitely is privacy-protecting age verification. You go to a government office, you show your ID, they give you a piece of paper that officially says "over 18 years old". Now you have a piece of paper that says you're over 18 but doesn't say who you are, and the government won't know where you use it.

On the Internet, the idea is the same, but with cryptography.


There is, a dumb header flag sent by the browser that attests to the user being in an age group.

Fakeable? Sure. Fakeable by an average 13-16 year old on a parental locked device? No.


By privacy-preserving, we usually mean that you get some kind of cryptographic token from an entity that knows who you are (and can attest that you are above age), and that token is anonymous, so when you use it to access a random service, that service cannot extract information about you from the token, except that you are above age.

It is possible, it just had to be implemented properly. We could complain about politicians not understanding that, of course. But if you spend 5 minutes reading complaints about age verification, you will see that nobody cares about understanding... if the people doesn't care, why would the politicians?


If you’re in Canada please write your MP about bill S-209, which brings this nonsense here.

As someone on a tech forum, we’re the only people who can really articulate the issues with the age verification approach.

It’s really the worst solution to these problems with awful tradeoffs.


You should also write the Cabinet Ministers, including the heritage minister Marc Miller.

I was not happy when they added Gemini to the top bar, in its own place that nothing else gets to use.

Not the OP, but:

- China is the largest open weight provider, with Mistral and Cohere delivering a few other models. There isn’t much else internationally

- (I think OP is suggesting) this would effectively ban Chinese models in the US, which would be an interesting case. Who knows if they could have theirs reviewed, or if we’ll see another FCC approved router situation.

- that Chinese models are censored is a very common criticism. If American models are also censored that looks bad.

- this will be awful for self hosters and local inference. Imagine if HuggingFace had to drop non-American model weights. That would effectively kill them.


> - that Chinese models are censored is a very common criticism. If American models are also censored that looks bad.

It's even worse than that for American models.

As an American, if I want to run a model locally and have to choose a censored model I will choose a Chinese censored model over an American censored model especially if it is the Trump administration doing the American censoring.

Chinese censorship is mostly directed at things that would not reduce the usefulness of the model for my applications. I doubt that would be the case with Trump censorship.

Same for products that spy on me. If a car for example is sending my travel log to Korea or the EU or China it is annoying but none of them are realistically going to do anything with the data that would seriously harm me. The risk is orders of magnitude higher if US governments or US law enforcement gets it.


I feel like it’s just as likely that China and MAGA mutually censor each others sensitive answers. Who in MAGA benefits from a Tiananmen focus? Who under Xi benefits from calling Jan 6 a failed coup?

Thanks!

I’ve exhausted the branches of my imagination, what is the danger of 10 pressure cookers?

You can make bombs out of pressure cookers. Since they are so good at holding pressure, you seal off the over-pressure release valves and then pressurize them until they burst (usually via some stupid or illegal means to begin with) then when they burst there is a ton of excess pressure. Big pressure = big boom.

They are exactly as good as any other pot made of 18/10 steel with similar thickness. Other vessels like propane tanks are much better.

Boston marathon worked because - well pressure cookers at the time didn't draw much attention to them.


But if you're not working with cutting torches and welding equipment, there's no easy way to open a propane tank enough to put an explosive in it (assuming purely amateur equipment) and then seal it up again good enough to hold high pressure. A pressure cooker on the other hand is ready made to have a big opening to put lots of stuff inside and then seal it up again.

there's tons of material online from religious radical groups on how to turn one into an IED


"Make A Bomb In The Kitchen Of Your Mom" sounds like the beginning of a teenager's bad joke

under no circumstances should you google the anarchist's cookbook

They make great bombs.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: