It's a crypto/blockchain podcast, but very technical, it's focused around the advanced technology that makes up the ecosystem (zero-knowledge cryptography, multi-party computation, consensus algorithms, miner-extractable value, new blockchain programming languages, etc).
Very technical, almost nothing about investing. The downside, some episodes may be a bit hard to jump into due to the technical nature.
One project I'm following is Aztec Protocol. It's an Ethereum L2 (so faster & cheaper transactions, similar to Lightning) but it supports any Ethereum asset (ETH, USDC, WBTC) and is fully private.
The only thing that goes for Ethereum is the fact that it's used for creating worthless numerous other pump and dump crypto currencies on top of its blockchain where Shiba Inu is the latest glorious example. Solves nothing, serves no purpose but increases the demand for Ethereum transactions which ultimately drives the cost of Ethereum. All those poor sods who have invested in Shiba Inu? Plain idiots to put it mildly.
Oh, and NFTs as well. Another worthless crap just to create more Ethereum transactions. Why worthless? Because ... Ethereum is just one of multiple crypto currencies/block chains and tell me again why your particular NFT on top of Ethereum is worth more than the same object on another blockchain? And how many times can the same object be (re)sold on all other blockchains? Do you need to own all of them? Or Ethereum NFT is somehow better?
No affiliation with Aztec, but it's absurd to lump them in the same bucket as Shiba.
> pump and dump crypto currencies
Aztec has been in development since 2017, and has solved some real problems in cryptography in order to accomplish their goals. Besides, it doesn't have its own token, so there's nothing to pump.
> Solves nothing, serves no purpose
It allows Ethereum users to transact in private.
> but increases the demand for Ethereum transactions which ultimately drives the cost of Ethereum
It does the opposite, since it's a rollup - the transactions happen off-chain.
The same reason that Bitcoin hasn't been displaced by newer projects.
Both have massive network effects. Marginal technology improvements aren't enough to convince developers to build on a platform that has no users, no application & no infrastructure.
Exactly, Ethereum is a better Store of Value than Bitcoin, not only because it is scarce, but because it provides utility, which creates demand.
People need ETH for:
* Paying transaction fees to use the network. For example, Visa is now settling payments with card issuers using USDC on Ethereum, so Visa needs to pay these fees with ETH.
* Collateral in financial applications: Over 11 million ETH (over $24 billion) have been locked as collateral in various financial protocols
* Staking & validating: In the same way that Bitcoin miners must purchase mining hardware to earn money, Eth2 validators must purchase ETH to earn staking rewards
Imo ETH is not a better store of value than bitcoin today because of hashpower supremacy and therefore security btc enjoys. Even when ethereum goes full on PoS, it will still be dependant on bitcoin.
The greatest motivation for Crypto success are hatred and fear.
BTC is succeeding because people hate/fear Central Banks printing money , so people love BTC and hate Central Banks.
Ethereum doesn't put itself up against the printing of money but against companies instead. Google, Apple, Spotify etc. People don't hate those companies and to the extent that they do....they manifest their hate by asking Government to tax them more, not migrating to a super hard to use and super costly decentralized platform to undercut their power. The consumer doesn't think in those terms.
If you think the point of decentralized systems are to ONLY replicate Google / Apple / Spotify services but in a decentralized manner, then you're mistaken.
When the internet came along, it wasn't to only replicate the Post-office or to just make mails faster. The internet enabled a lot of things you couldn't even predict at that time (or perhaps some could, if they truly understood the tech).
There are lots of things that the blockchain enables that you just cannot do in the traditional world even today. Couple of examples:
- You can use your tokens as collateral, borrow stablecoins and pay off your mortgage while the loan pays itself off from the interest being generated by the collateral - you do not have to pay back the loan => https://alchemix.fi/
- (Borrowed from another user in this thread) Flash loans provide the ability to atomicly borrow infinite money for the duration of a transaction, with no collateral or credit. This money can be used for arbitraging or just to provide working capital for a complex operation. If the loan isn't repaid by the end of the transaction, the whole transaction is cancelled. => https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCJUhnXQ76s
There's clearly going to be a lot more use-cases in the future. Finance is only the first field which is getting explored at the moment.
The most innovation is happening in financial products. There's no way for a developer or entrepreneur to experiment building in traditional finance without the support from large financial institutions. But in DeFi, there are financial applications built by teams in India, Africa, SE Asia, etc.
If you want an example of one innovation, look at flash loans. Flash loans provide the ability to atomicly borrow infinite money for the duration of a transaction, with no collateral or credit. This money can be used for arbitraging or just to provide working capital for a complex operation. If the loan isn't repaid by the end of the transaction, the whole transaction is cancelled.
Flash loans are not a real world application. They are just another tool needed within the cryptospace itself.
This is the problem currently. There's ten thousand teams building and building, but each one of them is building yet another library or yet another tool. Nobody has any idea how to connect the crypto economy to the real world economy.
The only applications possible are ones that you can do within the cryptospace itself, like lending one crypto against another, or creating some creative gambling game.
Unless somebody can figure out how to bridge the cryptospace to the real world economy, the whole castle of cards will eventually crumble.
Flash loans themselves are not an application, it's a primitive that other applications can build on top of.
There's many applications like DeFiSaver that use flash loans to allow users to migrate debt between lending protocols without needing additional capital.
It's a crypto/blockchain podcast, but very technical, it's focused around the advanced technology that makes up the ecosystem (zero-knowledge cryptography, multi-party computation, consensus algorithms, miner-extractable value, new blockchain programming languages, etc).
Very technical, almost nothing about investing. The downside, some episodes may be a bit hard to jump into due to the technical nature.