Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | dubeye's commentslogin

Because of user count? Same was said about instagram. with all due respect, devs don't seem to understand business

Or devs are just different users who care about different things and have different experiences.

Reminds me of the famous dropbox post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224 - I don't even know if dropbox still exists in 2026 but i'm still happily using rsync and mailing things around because dropbox has just absolutely never worked reliably for me, unlike my 2007 gmail account.

Likewise, if it were up to me, instagram and any business whose business model revolves around ads would be banned (because ads would be banned because advertisement is harmful in general).


It's fine to care about different stuff, but if you want to understand the valuation of a company, then your experience only goes so far. it's not going to make any sense unless you broaden your scope of interest to the metrics that impact valuation.

I don't read OP's post we're talking about ("What's crazy is that a company [...] could be worth more than $60B...") as not understanding, but as disagreeing that our world should work in such a way where this state of affair is even remotely considered acceptable

It's an interesting idea that society should somehow prevent companies valuation being linked to how many people use their product.

Unsure how it would work in practice.


Are you using the same AI engineering tools you were using 2-3 years ago? 1 year ago? I'm not. Without a network effect, capturing revenue is hard.

My use is not relevant. It's not ideal to extrapolate from your own personal habits. cursor's user volume and growth is the important thing

But do devs know a which IDE is better? That seems to be a rather important question here.

It's not 'the' most important question.

Who are the users? I haven't seen many pro users using cursor

Companies. Single devs can jump around IDEs and TUIs more easily but that’s not what companies tend to do.

  you've formed an opinion on the value of the company without knowing how many users it has? Kind of proves my point, no?

The person at the desk told the author this?

Interesting how unquestioning the responses are that this isn’t engagement bait


Advertising works


It’s easy to learn it’s just boring. Spend half your time marketing from day one. Be strict about it


A good habit is to ask for devils advocate opposite reply


That’s a separate excercise in most cases. Obtaining the cert is it’s in excercise and not sticky a security excercise


I’d be amazed if the companies were entirely oblivious to this.

In my experience it’s we know that they know that we know that they know …..


Building software is only a small part of any endeavour, be it a website, a PR stunt or a career.

there is no shame in just doing the building software bit. but it does sound like you've built it up to be more than it is


I'm an amateur and would never let AI touch a live database....


It doesn't feel like speech recognition has been improving at the same rate as other generative AI. It had a big jump up to about 6% WER a year or two ago, but it seems to have plateaued. Am I just using the wrong model? Or is human level error rate, some kind of limit, which I estimate to be about 5%.


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: