Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | no-name-here's commentslogin

I haven’t happened to have seen that - which web apps do it?

Hmm, at this point I think I might be imagining it ... I'll let you know if I can find it ...

Some older Apple keyboards had their backspace button labelled “delete” which to me made it sound like that was the “del” button and not the backspace button.

That was the convention on many older computing platforms.

A "Backspace" key on a typewriter did not actually delete: It merely moved the typing position back one space.



Also see the post yesterday by simonw on this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575062


As Simon said in his post:

> Honestly, it’s pretty terrible. Talking with it feels more like chatting with a Markov chain than an LLM—the responses may have a delightfully Victorian flavor to them but it’s hard to get a response that usefully answers a question.

I tried it and I agree.


I just randomly plugged in numbers to look up random Claude issues on github, and out of the 20 I checked, only one was closed as fixed. :-(


How certain are you of that?

That appears to be about providing a message to the user before requesting permissions.

However, it appears even permissions you allow your app to request still need to be declared beforehand? https://developer.android.com/training/permissions/requestin...

Regardless, people are reporting mixed info on whether the app declares location access: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557010


I checked all versions. Maybe, just maybe, the app was changed in response? Hmmm, I wonder...

https://imgur.com/a/SNJL4XO


> Or we can just have competitions in 3 categories [1. assigned male at birth (AMAB), 2. assigned female at birth, 3. anybody]

Wouldn't we expect AMAB to consistently win #1 and #3 (and obviously only AFAB can compete in #2), so trans men/trans women would never be a likely top competitor in any category? And categories 1 and 3 would likely always have exactly the same winners?

(I’m not stating a value judgment to the idea, just making sure we’re on the same page. And even the above idea still runs into issues with intersex people, or objections from some about women with high testosterone https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athletics_at_the_2016_Summer_O... )


>And categories 1 and 3 would likely always have exactly the same winners?

no, the point is that you can't compete in more than one category.

>so trans men/trans women would never be a likely top competitor in any category?

we don't really know. What if trans confirms strong biological advantage? Like getting best things from both sides?

>And even the above idea still runs into issues with intersex people

why not compete in the category 3?

> or objections from some about women with high testosterone

if it is biologically natural - cat 2, otherwise, as long as it is medical and not illegal doping - cat 3.


> it's unpayable

The deficit/debt exist because US tax rates (even including fed+state+local) are so low compared to every other major advanced economy in the world, even before last year's "One Big Beautiful (Ugly?) Bill". In fact, the US could have raised rates by more than 15% and still been the lowest. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2025/ap...

If US tax rates were even just the average among other G7 countries, it would be trillions more than the deficit per year.

(The US also has the lowest spending (fed+state+local) among them as well, but even though our spending is the lowest among them, the tax rates are so very low they're still not enough to cover even the lower spending compared to them. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2025/Ap... )


Attracting voters with things like repeatedly promising to drastically cut consumer prices on most everything ‘from day 1’, repeatedly promising no new wars/stopping being ‘the world police’, quickly ending the Russian invasion of Ukraine, etc?


Hey, I'm not saying Trump and the GOP are great. They disgust me. But they talk to people in a way they find engaging. Even when they lie, somehow. But regardless, I'm not sure how what you said has anything to do with what I wrote.

The Democratic party often sounds like a bunch of elitists, and that turns off many voters, even those who might consider themselves liberal or progressive. I'll likely vote for Democrats in every election until I die, but I don't think of myself as a Democrat, and haven't registered as one in decades (fortunately the Democratic party has open primaries in California, so I don't have to declare a party).


>The Democratic party often sounds like a bunch of elitists

Can you give an example of a Democrat politician making elitist statements?

How do you know this feeling isn't the result of propaganda by the Republican party and their news media supporters to paint the Democrats as elite?


I wish you were right, but I suspect it will be like how in recent years most people will say they never supported the Iraq invasion etc.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: