Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nphardon's commentslogin

There's some analogy around learning to play a song without using your ears and painting without using your eyes. Like the silliness on the drawing side is obvious. The benefits gained by using your ears to learn music (again this is such a silly statement when you think about it) are so huge and so overlooked by so many beginner guitar players. An hour of learning by ear is worth a week of reading. Also, as I see it, youtube is full of perpetual teachers looking for perpetual students; being a perpetual student sucks. All you need is records.

I also havent noticed the degradation and I'm not on Claude Code. I'm on week 4 of a continuous, large engineering project, C, massive industrial semiconductor codebase, with Opus, and while it's the biggest engagement I've had, its a single agent flow, and it's tiny on the scale of the use case in the post, so I wonder if they are just stressing the system to the point of failure.

I agree. The LLM writing turned me off to the article, and the ELI5 style is off putting.


I flagged it now for this reason.


Seems like my co is shedding US jobs and moving them to Taiwan, and paying up to 75% less in salary.


Where does this money go? I see that some is lost value, like in the downed aircraft, but what groups are profiting off this crazy flow?


Defense contractors, the oil companies who get to rebuild, private security, etc. You can do a web search for who profited from the Iraq war. It's mostly all the same. This war also has a religious component to it, as a US combat unit commander has said "the Iran war is part of God’s plan and that Pres. Donald Trump was anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth": https://jonathanlarsen.substack.com/p/us-troops-were-told-ir...


Must be a fun time to work on open problems. I published my graduate research close to a decade ago, often find myself fantasizing about tackling open problems with Claude.


I went *browserless on my device and it has solved my screen compulsion issues with very little downside. It has been the most effective step I've ever taken. I realized I really love msg'ing friends, having access to maps and navigation, banking, just a handful of apps (no google apps), and that all along it was the browser.

*ios doesnt let you delete Safari so I set a 10 minute timer on it, and i dont have any adblock or content filtering enabled, so it's essentially only good for brief checks (auto-shop phone number, quick news check, etc.) but is useless for anything beyond that.


I have been thinking the exact same thing! That while I "need" a smartphone for secure communications, banking and nav while traveling, it's Instagram and compulsive news/reddit consumption that keeps me instinctively checking my phone. I think I need to do the same thing on gOS.


Yes! Also shopping is an insidious thing. Now it's no longer a shopping tool. For me a common flow would be like, 1) think about some thing 2) instantly I'm scroll shopping somewhere 3) remember I'm too frugal to buy things 4) 10 minutes lost to the void. It's been really nice for me to break that particular cycle.


Web views still work?

I think that was part of Apple's rationale, that is was all coupled together. I assume that’s not the case here?


honestly, you couldn't even build your own house.


There's a great discussion with Stephen Wolfram on the Sean Carroll podcast. Listening to it made me think very highly of Wolfram. He's a free thinking, eccentric, mathematician, scientist; who got started doing serious work at a very young age. He still has a youthful creative approach to thought and science. I hope LLMs do pair well with his tools.


To save others a search, here's the podcast with Wolfram.

Stephen Wolfram on Computation, Hypergraphs, and Fundamental Physics - https://podbay.fm/p/sean-carrolls-mindscape-science-society-... (2hr 40min)

I'm a fan of his work and person too. Not a fanatic or evangelical level, but I do think he's one of the more historically relevant computer scientists and philosophers working today. I can overlook his occasional arrogance, and recognize that there's a genuine and original thinker who's been pursuing truth and knowledge for decades.


Sean also publishes transcripts of all episodes; https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2021/07/12/155-...


Same here. I've found the "me me me" a bit off-putting over the years, but can't deny that he is a genuinely smart, interesting, and forward thinking person. I especially enjoyed his writings on measuring every aspect of his life [1].

Also Wolfram (person and company) don't seem to be stodgy and stuck in old ways. At least as an outside observer (I'm not a mathematician, nor do I use Wolfram's main tools), seem to handle new trends with their own unique contributions to augment those trends:

Wolfram Alpha was a genuinely useful and good tool, perfect for the times.

These tools will actually further supercharge LLMs in certain use cases. They've provided multiple ways to adopt them.

Looking forward to see what people will do with this stuff.

1: https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2012/03/the-personal-ana...


He live streams the (internal) Wolfram Alpha product meetings on YouTube. It's really interesting to watch, I've been a fly on the wall for years.


I knew about this but never attended, so cool!


I tried finding this but couldn't find them on youtube. Can you please share the link for one of the videos?


It's under the Live tab of Wolfram's channel:

https://www.youtube.com/@WolframResearch/streams

Sessions are called Live CEOing, e.g.:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id0KH0sfHI8


Thanks, I should have linked. Also he cross-posts to his site:

https://livestreams.stephenwolfram.com/category/live-ceoing/

The next one is today, 4:30 PM ET!


Thank you!!


He's been in AI-land forever, the whole idea of Wolfram Alpha circa 2009 was to transform natural language into algorithms. I met him briefly in New York when he was on a panel on AI ethics in 2016, and ya, dude is sharp.


I'm fairly certain Stephen Wolfram will be one of the few intellectuals today that will still be remembered in 50 years.


I already remember him from 25 years ago


he seems to be a good software engineer at least, but what about his science? does it all revolve around re-modelling the universe in his software?


He got famous solving quantum field theory problems


he seems to think his times better spent on software than science it seems. i take it he didnt really crack anything of worth on the physics side then?


To be fair, he's been trying, he's a big fan of cellular automaton.


Recently I went back to The Ecstasy of Communication by Jean Baudrillard which I couldn't get through back in the day when I first picked it up. I used Haiku to walk me through the first chapter, and Haiku would not state anything verbatim due to copyright, but if I referenced a sentence it knew it exactly.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: