Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pentaphobe's commentslogin

`[citation needed]`

And they wrote "... you'd need to pick a side and lose the pun.."

And I am able to read four sentences.

Evidently reading isn't the same as comprehension

Short answer: no.

Long answer [^1]:

> Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states:

> "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."

[^1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline...


"Sculpting" as used here just feels like a pretentious euphemism for "vibing" as opposed to what actual sculpting is like (hint: it would be akin to... dramatic pause... writing code)

Brb, just rolled my eyes so hard that I'm now staring at my own visual cortex


All the GitHub links on your extension page are borked (including issues)

From the look of the associated domain it looks like you're going full product, best of luck

I'm a huge proponent of graph & visual analysis of complex systems - would have loved to try this out, but will always skip closed source editor extensions (especially in the age of widespread npm supply chain attacks & vibe coding)


Here's the source code minified and bundled:

https://www.gallery.vsassets.io/_apis/public/gallery/publish...

Unzip that archive and the source is in extension/dist folder.


I’m confused - is it the actual source code, or minified/bundled code? I don’t think those two are the same thing - unless of course you write your code minified. That would be really impressive.


That would be really impressive levels of psychopathy.


We will make this project open source soon!


No. Just, no to all of this


This is a really cool idea, nice work!

Is it any more effective than (say) messing with its recognition so that any attempt to deepfake just ends up as garbled nonsense?

Can't help wondering if the censor models get tweaked more frequently and aggressively (also presumedly easier to low-pass on a detector than a generator, since lossiness doesn't impact final image)


> we shouldn't ban tools

When I see the old BuT FrEe SpEeCH argument repurposed to impinge civil rights I start warming to the idea of banning tools.

Alternately "Chemical weapons don't kill people, people with chemical weapons kill people"


Not really, its like banning chemistry sets cause they may be used to create chemical weapons.


Not sure the comparison works when it does all the work for you

I've had very little success mumbling "you are an expert chemist..." to test tubes and raw materials.


Or making knives that turn into overcooked noodles if you try to use them on anything except vegetables and acceptable meats


and who decides if I want to use a knife to cut mushrooms instead? see where I am going, there are (or could exist) legit cases when you need to use it in a non-standard way, one that the model authors didn't anticipate.


Obligatory Benn Jordan link (YouTube - ~11mins)

This Flock Camera Leak is like Netflix for Stalkers

https://youtube.com/watch?v=vU1-uiUlHTo


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: