Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The title is "a purely functional Scheme..."


No, no, I think Owl did well, because it didn't say that it's scheme, at least up front. It's honestly more akin to DSSSL than anything else. Saying that it's "functional scheme" is far less likely to cause confusion than some of the other things people have done.

EDIT: No, it's not like DSSSL, and it's less cool than I thought it was. It's still cool, though.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: