I think the more-useful question is whether folks knew the tradeoffs and made an informed decision in the first place.
Should someone have made more effort to determine the tradeoffs before widespread implementation? Were any facts withheld or investigation curtailed? Did one group (wrongly?) benefit from another group's ignorance?
I think the more-useful question is whether folks knew the tradeoffs and made an informed decision in the first place.
Should someone have made more effort to determine the tradeoffs before widespread implementation? Were any facts withheld or investigation curtailed? Did one group (wrongly?) benefit from another group's ignorance?