> I'm pretty sure media corps would be fine with an IE world.
But that's not the world we live in. We live in a world where Firefox saved the web, Chrom{e,ium} has changed it as well (though they have done plenty of things I think are horrible). In _that world_, they are trying to piggyback off the current state of the web's open standards by adding extensions that will only work because the same browsers that made the web what it is today are now forced to implement EME.
> Chromium is developed by the work paid by bigcorps, not by the free software community. The code being open source doesn't change this.
By that logic, Linux is not developed by the free software community (80% of kernel development is done by developers paid by companies -- which I think is great).
But that's not the world we live in. We live in a world where Firefox saved the web, Chrom{e,ium} has changed it as well (though they have done plenty of things I think are horrible). In _that world_, they are trying to piggyback off the current state of the web's open standards by adding extensions that will only work because the same browsers that made the web what it is today are now forced to implement EME.
> Chromium is developed by the work paid by bigcorps, not by the free software community. The code being open source doesn't change this.
By that logic, Linux is not developed by the free software community (80% of kernel development is done by developers paid by companies -- which I think is great).