I'm open to what ifs, but I've seen enough critiques of pretty basic stuff that he's got wrong to let me know that he doesn't really understand the web as well as he thinks he does, and therefore his criticism is pretty biased, and misleading, and unlikely to produce any real solutions.
Yea? Do you mind sharing the basic stuff that he's gotten wrong? Because I learned a few things and found the article to be well researched (but what do I know ...)
