> Trump telling the Russians or Wikileake to release some more stolen emails?
That was on public TV with reporters around. I remember that, pretty sure it was a joke. Is that the only evidence of Russian collusion?
To go back, it all started with Russian altering votes. As in, hiding in Wisconsin, in the bushes with laptops, giving Trump extra votes. We even had recount which both Stein and Clinton supported. People were donating towards it and everything.
Then it went Putin and Trump are exchanging secret hand gestures at G20.
Then some Trump people were in the same hotel at some meeting at Putin people, so that was considered "collusion".
Then it was the piss "dossier".
I still don't see solid evidence of collusion vis-a-vis the amount of time and energy devoted to talking about. Many articles today even start with "Given that Trump colluded with Russia...". So used as an established fact and I think it is far from it.
That was on public TV with reporters around. I remember that, pretty sure it was a joke. Is that the only evidence of Russian collusion?
To go back, it all started with Russian altering votes. As in, hiding in Wisconsin, in the bushes with laptops, giving Trump extra votes. We even had recount which both Stein and Clinton supported. People were donating towards it and everything.
Then it went Putin and Trump are exchanging secret hand gestures at G20.
Then some Trump people were in the same hotel at some meeting at Putin people, so that was considered "collusion".
Then it was the piss "dossier".
I still don't see solid evidence of collusion vis-a-vis the amount of time and energy devoted to talking about. Many articles today even start with "Given that Trump colluded with Russia...". So used as an established fact and I think it is far from it.