On what grounds should an unrelated party (furyg3) force their will on two voluntarily trading parties, blocking their (presumably mutually beneficial, since voluntary) transaction?
That's a strangely oppressive, i-know-best-what's-good-for-you position.
On what grounds should an unrelated party (the government, via labor law) force their will on two voluntarily trading parties, blocking their transaction?
Because wage slavery exists and you can't shrug your shoulders and say "well, they're choosing to work for peanuts so it's fine!".
That's a strangely oppressive, i-know-best-what's-good-for-you position.