Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

if this is based on public record, how come it is only exposed now


There are two economists – one young and one old – walking down the street together.

The young economist looks down and sees a $20 bill on the street and says, “Hey, look a twenty-dollar bill!”

Without even looking, his older and wiser colleague replies, “Nonsense. If there had been a twenty-dollar lying on the street, someone would have already picked it up by now.”


Libor manipulation was on the public record years before the scandal blew up. Exposing anything but dirt-simple financial fraud is hard, even to people who know all the facts.


Amusingly(?..) LIBOR-style manipulation still exists in other markets! https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-02-01/was-ch...

Strange to think that incentives like this are/were considered the best solution and can last so long.


Libor was always a joke.

If you’re looking for a loan, why would you care what the average rate is between a number of providers? You’re going to take the lowest rate, right?

And then why would you throw out the lowest and highest values? One of those is the most competitive rates!

It also didn’t say anything about depth of market. A bank may have loaned you $1 at a low rate, but maybe not any more than that.

And then it was all self-reported, not based on market.


Malcolm Gladwell has a great piece about how all the information needed to piece together Enron's fraud was always available in public records. Worth a read.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/01/08/open-secrets-3




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: