Maybe we would be using oberon. But then, go owes as much to oberon as it owes t... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		sacado2 on Dec 4, 2019 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: The Principles of Versioning in Go Maybe we would be using oberon. But then, go owes as much to oberon as it owes to C.

pjmlp on Dec 4, 2019 [–]

Oberon was good for its time back in early 90's, too little for modern computing.

We would be better served with Modula-3 or Active Oberon, which Go failed to learn from.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact