Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Everytime I install Linux, there is always something that's frustrating. Like the other day, I couldn't watch NYTimes video in fullscreen mode without Chrome crashing. Ok, so, I installed Firefox. Fullscreen video goes to my vertical monitor. No way to change this behavior.

Desktop Linux is developed by people who love CLI. It's not built by people that try to address problems of common mundane people off the street.

I'd rather use Windows than Linux for daily driver. Atleast UI will not freak out like in Ubuntu.

Half the time I read people saying have you tried Linux Desktop, I either see people who are tasteless and love being nerdy with tmux environment, or people who are expecting others to be like themselves.

As Linus Torvalds would plainly put "Desktop Linux sucks. It is the worst piece of shit attempt at Desktop OS". :-)



Are you using the Nouveau graphics driver? Chrome reliably crashes my machine with Nouveau (though nothing else seems to). After I install NVidia's driver, it's rock solid.

I get far more UI freakouts in Windows.


I love Linux, and I use it every day, but I sincerely believe it does not have a future on the desktop.


Google chrome, linux, and Nvidia are the best bet on trifectas. Full screen video works, cool new webGL pages work well, games work well (steam has quite a few that work with proton), stable (can login for months), netflix, amazon prime, youtube, etc just works full screen or in a window.

Most of the glitchy stuff I've seen like you describe is either nvidia+nouveu driver, or AMD's GPUs.


Aka ChromeOS has won the Web.


Desktop Linux is developed by people who develop Linux.

Our operating system in an outlet for so many cultures — privacy minded, seeking freedom or free, people who hack and patch, etc, etc. And your first instinct is to take it away, make it another Windows/macOs for you who don't even run Linux.

I feel sorry for people who tried to help you, that's you who expect others to be like yourself.

Linux gives me the system I want — functional understood minimalist retro style [1]. And I am not alone [2], these are not tasteless, that's my home. Get off my lawn!

[1] http://sergeykish.com/side-by-side-no-decorations.png

[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/unixporn/


Pity that so many of such "Linux developers" rather live in macOS and cross develop to GNU/Linux, instead of sponsoring Linux hardware OEMs.


Then we need to fund the developers working on this. Money makes things happen. Simple as that.


This is truth, but not the whole truth. Beside money, you need somebody with a right vision at helm.

Look at the direction modern Gnome goes. They have the money from Red Hat and Canonical. BTW systemd too was developed by salaried employees of Red Hat. Money makes things happen, but not always the nicest things.


And there simply is no helm. Who do you donate to? Not that an individual donation would make a difference, anyway.

There's now, what, 3 forks of RHEL? People are free to do what they want, of course, but this doesn't help Linux at all.


> BTW systemd too was developed by salaried employees of Red Hat.

For all its faults, systemd was a major step forward for a system to "just work".


I disagree. Even with money, there's too much fragmentation in the Linux ecosystem, and while choice is nice, the parts often don't play well with each other. What Linux needs is more big companies taking over and forcing their direction. Ubuntu and Fedora did a lot for desktop Linux, because they forced some controversial decisions upon the community, instead of being stuck in endless battle of supporting every legacy toolkit and supporting every fork that comes up whenever a controversial decision occurs.


Definitely. I like the idea of open source quality Desktop OS, but not acknowledging issues with it is not helping.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: