> communication regarding how they want to purport themselves in the community
But the post is titled "How our AWS Rust team will contribute to Rust’s future successes", but doesn't actually say anything - at all. It's all just empty words without content.
Apparently the mods agree, since the submission was downranked and blocked from the front page. Or maybe the algorithm picked up the odd upvote count and critical comment downvoting that is quite common for AWS submissions.
I don't mind a decent content marketing post that is supportive of Rust, but this one just rubs me the wrong way.
> But the post is titled "How our AWS Rust team will contribute to Rust’s future successes", but doesn't actually say anything - at all.
Maybe. I also think a case could be made that AWS coming out in support of Rust, and talking about how many products already use Rust and that they plan to have more is contributing to Rust's future success.
Big companies/services like Amazon with AWS, Google with Compute or Microsoft with Azure stating how they are leveraging and making wide use of a technology provides a non-negligible boost to how that technology is viewed, whether they actually do anything or not.
But the post is titled "How our AWS Rust team will contribute to Rust’s future successes", but doesn't actually say anything - at all. It's all just empty words without content.
Apparently the mods agree, since the submission was downranked and blocked from the front page. Or maybe the algorithm picked up the odd upvote count and critical comment downvoting that is quite common for AWS submissions.
I don't mind a decent content marketing post that is supportive of Rust, but this one just rubs me the wrong way.