WRT 1. you're saying that >"*He and his mumblings should be should be flushe...

		pbhjpbhj on Aug 11, 2011 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Captchas To Keep Idiots Out Of Comment Threads WRT 1. you're saying that >"He and his mumblings should be should be flushed down the toilet bowl // So arguably you're making the case to ignore his [implied] argument based on, in the antecedent sentence, his character. Sounds ad hominem to me. Just saying.

It's possibly an ad hominem, but not likely to me. http://plover.net/~bonds/adhominem.html