It's stronger than ever. Sure there's churn but to say it's broken is to challenge anyone making that claim to get along without it for any significant amount of time and continue their job, usages of the internet, and advantages thereof. I bet they will quickly revise their claim to some more specific aspect of open source.
Reading through the article the author doesn't seem be able to separate pay from success and uses anecdotes to support their point that open source is broken. They don't separate how any core library from a commercial company would have been any different in their security failures. This is like a poorly written first draft of a freshman research paper.
Reading through the article the author doesn't seem be able to separate pay from success and uses anecdotes to support their point that open source is broken. They don't separate how any core library from a commercial company would have been any different in their security failures. This is like a poorly written first draft of a freshman research paper.