You turned this thread into a hellish flamewar in multiple places—like, at least 6 different places if I counted right. That's basically arson. We ban that sort of account. If you don't want to be banned, please review the guidelines and stick to them: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. Note these two, among others:
"Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."
"Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity."
Edit: you've been using HN for ideological battle in other places too—e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31378481. It's not ok to abuse the site this way, regardless of what your views are or how right you feel they are. No more of this, please.
HN is a moderated/curated site and I'm one of the moderators. It's literally my job to do this and I would not be doing it otherwise.
You might be under a misimpression of what Hacker News is for. It's for thoughtful conversation about topics that gratify intellectual curiosity. Ideological flamewar is the opposite of that, so we don't want it here and we ban accounts that keep doing it. If you read https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html, you will hopefully get the idea.*
You can call that 'censorship' if you want to—people use that word in many different ways—but you should understand why we moderate HN the way we do. It's because we're trying to have a specific sort of forum. If we just let the default forces of the internet have their way with this place, it would quickly cease to be that sort of forum. Therefore our only choices are either (a) to moderate HN or (b) to abandon the site's mandate (of intellectual curiosity) - and we're not going to abandon the mandate.
Look at it this way: games need rules. If you're trying to play one game (say, chess) rather than another (say, football), you need to follow the rules of chess. Is it censorship that you're not allowed to tackle the opponent's bishop? or that you can't capture a piece by jumping over it, like you can in checkers? I wouldn't say so. In a similar way, we're trying to play a specific type of game on HN. It's not as well-defined as chess or checkers or football, but I think the analogy is still useful.
* There are also lots of past explanations at these links:
"Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive."
"Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity."
We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31379889.
Edit: you've been using HN for ideological battle in other places too—e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31378481. It's not ok to abuse the site this way, regardless of what your views are or how right you feel they are. No more of this, please.