The influence of US News on colleges is wild. One absurd tidbit that I've heard: the rankings weigh freshman stats much more than transfer student stats, so a lot of competitive schools that won't let you in as a freshman if you would hurt their SAT/GPA/etc averages will happily let you in as a transfer because they'll make more revenue and your stats no longer hurt their rankings. *
The ranking formula is also changed arbitrarily based on the reactions of colleges and readers. My school went from #9 to #1 one year, there were a lot of "wth??" reactions, and the following year the formula was tweaked so that our ranking dipped down to #4. I'm pretty sure nothing changed materially in the school over those 3 years, but the ranking moved around a lot.
The whole system is a farce.
* I haven't researched freshman vs transfer data myself, but it's something I've heard from multiple startup founders in the college education space.
Depends on the school. At a place like Harvard or Yale it is incredibly difficult to get in as a transfer, much harder than to get in in the first place.
Yeah but that's Tier 0, it's not surprising that HYPSM don't feel the need to engage in as many number fudging tactics. It's a lot more impactful to Tier 1 top schools (e.g. a Dartmouth) where USN ranks them.
The ranking formula is also changed arbitrarily based on the reactions of colleges and readers. My school went from #9 to #1 one year, there were a lot of "wth??" reactions, and the following year the formula was tweaked so that our ranking dipped down to #4. I'm pretty sure nothing changed materially in the school over those 3 years, but the ranking moved around a lot.
The whole system is a farce.
* I haven't researched freshman vs transfer data myself, but it's something I've heard from multiple startup founders in the college education space.