That's a very negative take on it. The second person to object to SOPA wasn't plagiarising the first.

They're making the same point using a similar argument but that's very different to plagiarism.

I don't see it. Can you point out similar passages?

Well, for one, compare Love's entire first section to the table at the end of Albini's essay.

Either you haven't read both articles or you need to refresh your memory on what plagiarism is, because this isn't even close.