Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

First why not Lenard and Second, the picture (the short one) shows her hair and ceiling and not her breasts.

And Third but minor complaint, if we look at the "Full" picture i at least "want" to see his butt.



It’s true. Imagery comparison is highly dependent on butts.


It's all about the lights and "well" rounded "objects". But a bavarian belly could do the job as well.


I mean, rendering fingers and butts are things we need the AI to improve in.


Pretty sure the Internet's want feet not finger, and yeah butts ;))


Dude, it's literally porn. This is not hard.


It's not pornography. The full image is erotic in its nature. The cropped image aligns with pretty much any other non-nude glamour photography.


This is from a shoot in literally the most well known and influential pornographic magazine of all time. Y'all don't even know what the word means if you don't think Playboy centerfold shoot qualifies.


> "Y'all don't even know what the word means if you don't think Playboy centerfold shoot qualifies."

Right back at you.


Are you from a rural community in the US by any chance? I don't think I know anyone who would classify the Playboy as porn. There's a difference between erotic photography and pornography.


When i was in the Swiss Military porn was a ~no-go, but we got Playboy for free..and the NZZ and some other papers.


Erotica =/= Porn


That's what I keep telling my mom too, buddy.


I think your mom could tell the difference between Lena's picture and Pornhub's front page.


What sort of hussy shows her shoulders?


> Dude, it's literally porn. This is not hard.

You are going to far, i don't think Lenard has anything todo with porn...well maybe the feather is a bit inappropriate for the normal US-Citizen but if you look at your Music-videos i don't think it's too much.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: