But that's terrible, because it seems like a good way to learn about OpenAI. It presents as if you can listen to this to gain insight into how OpenAI operates.
But you can't. What you get is a hour long PR fluff piece about a man related to OpenAI. But you listen anyway, and because it's appearing as this useful thing, your normal skepticism guards are down. So you swallow what could be abject nonsense.
More meta but thats all conversations. You never know how "vulnerable" someone is being no matter the medium, so again, it's up to you to understand that and gather the information that is there.
It absolutely has something to do with it. One of the symptoms of autism is a weak theory of mind, i.e. the inability to see the world through the perspective of another person, i.e. to understand their motivations.
Disagree. In podcasts I love interviews and conversations rather than monologues. I think the pauses and speakers taking turns, make listening less monotonous and also cognitively probably helps absorb info better
Monologues aren’t a realistic alternative, no podcast I know of is just one person speaking constantly. That sounds more like political radio shows, and those are also terrible.
Podcasts may not be a particularly efficient way to convey information, but they make up for it in convenience. You can listen while doing other things like walking the dog and make use of otherwise wasted time.
