I just tried this on questions I had about archery and bow design. It was immediately useful in highlighting and summarizing sources into something coherent while citing sources for deeper study.
On the other hand, when I asked it to tell me the difference between spine weight of wooden arrows and spine numbers on carbon arrows, it was not as useful. That is because no one has ever written an article about it, and when I was looking for that manually, I had to find that answer by inferring from a technical PDF. (The answer starts with, spine weight on wooden arrows do not directly measure deflection, and was created by a trade association, rather than the spine deflection numbers designed by an organization that standardizes weights and measures of materials for engineers).
The low hanging fruit here may be to ingest and summarize pdfs and papers.
On the other hand, when I asked it to tell me the difference between spine weight of wooden arrows and spine numbers on carbon arrows, it was not as useful. That is because no one has ever written an article about it, and when I was looking for that manually, I had to find that answer by inferring from a technical PDF. (The answer starts with, spine weight on wooden arrows do not directly measure deflection, and was created by a trade association, rather than the spine deflection numbers designed by an organization that standardizes weights and measures of materials for engineers).
The low hanging fruit here may be to ingest and summarize pdfs and papers.