First, please don't force your ideology down my throat. Specially, not through guilt. You are better than a Viagra salesman or a priest.
Second, please don't dismiss my own fucking problems as ``first world'', as if you know shit about other people's life. Again, you are not a douchebag, so don't behave like one. Yes, I know there are Foreign People suffering now. They can suck it up. We are all grown-ups now, we have problems too, and we have to take care of ourselves. We can not spend all of our life feeling sorry for others.
Third, you don't understand very much about hedonism, morality, philosophy or living. Let's try to be humble and not spit "morally bankrupt!" at every lifestyle with which you disagree. For example, Kant didn't arrive to the conclusion that, to be moral, he had to give all his belongings to the poor. Figure why.
Whilst I think he was a bit confrontational you didn't address his points at all.
I am slightly bothered whenever someone dismisses a problem as "first world." For some problems such as "My parents won't buy me a new iPhone" I can see where the person is coming from. However when someone has a legitimate problem dismissing it as "first world," is unhelpful and potentially harmful.
"Don't complain about having difficulty at work, at least you aren't starving!" We all have problems, some worse than others. That doesn't mean you can just dismiss any problem someone has just because they aren't in the worst situation possible.
Second, please don't dismiss my own fucking problems as ``first world'', as if you know shit about other people's life. Again, you are not a douchebag, so don't behave like one. Yes, I know there are Foreign People suffering now. They can suck it up. We are all grown-ups now, we have problems too, and we have to take care of ourselves. We can not spend all of our life feeling sorry for others.
Third, you don't understand very much about hedonism, morality, philosophy or living. Let's try to be humble and not spit "morally bankrupt!" at every lifestyle with which you disagree. For example, Kant didn't arrive to the conclusion that, to be moral, he had to give all his belongings to the poor. Figure why.