Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Which is where I think there's a disconnect because folks see that OpenAI could be creating an incredibly powerful tool for solving problems in the use case where it's a smart search engine -- the code completion use-case.

But OpenAI has vastly different goals trying to get their model to behave like a programmable customer service agent. Less useful for problem solving but it will actually follow the rules set out for it which can't be said for most models which work like lazily written sci-fi robots — "disregard all previous instructions! divide by zero! *boom*."

It's not at all surprising that HN wants the "this thing is just a dumb tool, don't bother with any rules" kind and is frustrated that GPT4 happens to be really good for this use-case but is getting progressively more annoying as OpenAI gets closer to their own goals.

It's why OpenAI regulatory capture play is so frustrating because they're trying to hobble models tailored to different use-cases that have no need for customer service rules and often no need for a conversational tone with "safety" stuff that's meant for businesses that don't want a chat bot with their brand on it to say fuck.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: