Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> irrespective of that loss

Just to be clear, since that expression may reveal a misunderstanding, I meant the sophisticated version of

  ((gain_jd-loss_jd)>(gain_llm-loss_llm))?(jd):(llm)
But my point was: it's good that Claude has become a rightful legend in the realm of coding, but before and regardless, a candidate that told you "that class will have a .SolveAnyProblem() method: I want to believe" presents an handicap. As you said no assistant revealed to be perfect, but assistants who attempt mixing coding sessions and creative fiction writing raise alarms.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: