Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I believe you can't copyright a _style_ of art.

> no, you cannot copyright the Studio Ghibli art style itself. Copyright law doesn’t protect styles, techniques, or general aesthetics—like the hand-drawn, watercolor-inspired look with soft colors, detailed natural backgrounds, and whimsical vibes that Studio Ghibli is known for. It only protects specific, original works, like an individual film frame or character design from Spirited Away or My Neighbor Totoro.

And your answer... Doesn't seem to cover my question, I think. So the point of copyright is that the value of the style doesn't degrade?



Copyright is also just an outright fabricated concept intended to protect interest of authors. It can be expanded or removed as needed.

It's just like an API. The very definition can be changed upstream by patches. People seem to miss that.


Yes, of course! By all means, update the law. I don’t think anyone misses that part of being a human. Any concept we think of is fabricated.

But here’s the real meat of the issue I guess, how far do we wanna go? At what point SHOULD something be un-copyrightable? What describes a certain “style”? My style is black&white, can I copyright that?

What would your diff be? :)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: