Okay, so it's not a dichotomy, but doesn't the comparison still makes sense?
Apple is way over toward the "pay for the product" end of the spectrum, and conversely Twitter are committed to the "selling the users' attention" business model.
Even if the difference is not clear cut, people who like Gruber expressly favour one side have reason to want more of the kind.
Apple is way over toward the "pay for the product" end of the spectrum, and conversely Twitter are committed to the "selling the users' attention" business model.
Even if the difference is not clear cut, people who like Gruber expressly favour one side have reason to want more of the kind.