How reliable is Pangram now? In the past, these types of detectors had a really ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		Shank 48 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Meta Deployed AI and It Is Killing Our Agency How reliable is Pangram now? In the past, these types of detectors had a really high false positive rate. Is it improved?

Lucent 46 days ago [–]

When it flags something as high confidence, 3.1 is very reliable. Human-authored text I saw scoring ~70 with 3.0 now scores ~15. With scores above 90, the false positive rate looks to be about zero. https://www.pangram.com/blog/pangram-3-0-technical

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact