Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is how successful things are created. By iterating on less successful things until they become successful.

The cost of iterating (with software) dropped by a few orders of magnitude in the last few months.

 help



But you need to actually be the one doing the iterating, you can't outsource it. The entire point to doing the iteration is the process, not the artefacts.

I'm finding I can iterate significantly faster if the coding agent is doing the typing for me, and learn at a faster rate as a result.

Hmm interesting, I didn't realise people were using it as a typing replacement instead of having it work agentically. Does that mean when you want to change a line of code somewhere, you just prompt the LLM to replace line 334 with your changes etc? So do you not use the LLM autonomously at all then? Sounds like it since you're still doing the iteration yourself.

I do both. A lot of changes are "autonomous" like "add a new Django model to record a change every time the title or body is edited in the admin", but I also do more fine grained edits like "have the import script truncate to 400 chars" (instead of 250.)

Sometimes I'll make edits like 400 to 250 by hand, but if I'm prompting on my phone it's faster to have the model do it as navigating code in an editor and changing it at the exact right point is fiddly on a mobile keyboard - models can spot and account for typos, direct code editing can't.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: