Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The 2ms it takes to run jq versus the 0.2ms to run an alternative is not why your coding agent feels slow.


Still, jq is run a whole lot more than it used to be due to coding agents, so every bit helps.

The vast majority of Linux kernel performance improvement patches probably have way less of a real world impact than this.


> The vast majority of Linux kernel performance improvement patches probably have way less of a real world impact than this.

unlikely given that the number they are multiplying by every improvement is far higher than "times jq is run in some pipeline". Even 0.1% improvement in kernel is probably far far higher impact than this


Jq is run a ton by AIs, and that is only increasing.


I can't take seriously any talk about performance if the tools are going to shell out. It's just not a bottleneck.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: