A motion for injunction asks the court to make some party do or not do something. Injunction orders have lots of routine but fact-specific details. Anyone filing a motion for injunction will file a proposed order, to save the court the hassle of pulling those details from the motion and typing them into an order, and also to eliminate any "loss in translation" from that process.
Lawyers know that submitting a proposed order is routine (not just for injunctions, but almost any motion), and that the judge will strike or rewrite anything he or she does not agree with. But when you phrase it the way the article does--that the media companies get to write the order (as if everyone else doesn't)--that falsely implies special treatment and influence.
Lawyers know that submitting a proposed order is routine (not just for injunctions, but almost any motion), and that the judge will strike or rewrite anything he or she does not agree with. But when you phrase it the way the article does--that the media companies get to write the order (as if everyone else doesn't)--that falsely implies special treatment and influence.